HomeBlockchainShould LUNC Finally Choose a Leader? Here's Why It Matters

Should LUNC Finally Choose a Leader? Here’s Why It Matters

-

Since Terra’s collapse in May 2022, LUNC has faced fragmentation, unclear governance, and no clear vision. Community proposals often conflict, and decision making is slow. This adds to the volatility and makes it hard to attract developers.

A strong and visible leader or leadership team could bring:

1. Clarity and Coordination
Key figures can help align the strategy across token burning, development, and ecosystem growth.

2. Credibility
A trusted leader can build confidence, attract skilled people, and rebuild trust in the project.

3. Momentum
Even imperfect leadership is better than no direction. It helps move the project forward, which is important for a token with weak fundamentals.

Two names are often mentioned: Do Kwon and CZ (Changpeng Zhao, founder of Binance). But who is better for LUNC?

1. Do Kwon: The Founder’s Return?

Background
Do Kwon co-founded Terraform Labs and led Terra until UST crashed. After the collapse, he introduced “Revival Plan 2,” which created a split between Terra Classic (LUNC) and Terra 2.0 (the new LUNA).

A. Pros

Founder legitimacy: He understands system architecture and technical debt from day one.

Governance familiarity: Early proposals had his influence, giving LUNC a backbone.

B. Cons

Legal baggage: Facing international legal proceeding.

Trust deficit: His role in the collapse means many see him as a liability, not a savior.

2. CZ: The Industry Titan?

Background
Changpeng Zhao, co-founder and former CEO of Binance, has deep crypto influence. Although he stepped down in Nov 2023 and served four months in prison for money‑laundering, he remains a major strategic advisor globally.

A. Pros

Brand boost: His name adds instant credibility and visibility.

Resource-rich: Binance has burned LUNC tokens and remains engaged in LUNC’s burns

Operational know-how: He’s scaled Binance through tumultuous markets, this experience could leverage LUNC.

B. Cons

Community pushback: Several proposals to appoint him sparked backlash for appearing unserious or overly centralized.

Conflict of interest: As Binance advisor, his strategic goals may not align perfectly with LUNC’s decentralizing ethos.

So who is better :

1. Do Kwon has technical knowledge but legal risks.

2. CZ has resources and trust but no deep link to LUNC’s core.

3. The best option may be a mix CZ as advisor and a trusted team to lead development.

Adit 39
Adit 39https://www.adit39studio.com/
The world shall know PAIN

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

LATEST POSTS

USTC Price Primed for Breakout: Accumulation Signals Smart Money is Buying

USTC has been consolidating in a tight range, and this could be the calm before a major move. For weeks, USTC has traded between $0.0128 support...

LUNC Price Consolidates: Could a Breakout to 0.000070 Be Next?

Luna Classic (LUNC) is forming a textbook accumulation range on the 4-hour chart, a setup seasoned traders watch closely before major price moves. For several weeks,...

304.90 Million LUNC Burned in 7 Days – Can the Community Push to 500 Million by Week’s End?

The Terra Classic (LUNC) community has achieved another major milestone, burning 304.90 million tokens in just the past seven days. This steady burn rate reflects...

Did You Know: 416.75 Billion LUNC Burned Since May 2022

Since May 13, 2022, the Luna Classic (LUNC) community has relentlessly pushed for token burns to reduce supply and strengthen its ecosystem. Over this period,...

https://luncdaily.com/wp-
content/uploads/2025/08/IMG_3245.webp

Most Popular