HomeBlockchainShould LUNC Finally Choose a Leader? Here's Why It Matters

Should LUNC Finally Choose a Leader? Here’s Why It Matters

-

Since Terra’s collapse in May 2022, LUNC has faced fragmentation, unclear governance, and no clear vision. Community proposals often conflict, and decision making is slow. This adds to the volatility and makes it hard to attract developers.

A strong and visible leader or leadership team could bring:

1. Clarity and Coordination
Key figures can help align the strategy across token burning, development, and ecosystem growth.

2. Credibility
A trusted leader can build confidence, attract skilled people, and rebuild trust in the project.

3. Momentum
Even imperfect leadership is better than no direction. It helps move the project forward, which is important for a token with weak fundamentals.

Two names are often mentioned: Do Kwon and CZ (Changpeng Zhao, founder of Binance). But who is better for LUNC?

1. Do Kwon: The Founder’s Return?

Background
Do Kwon co-founded Terraform Labs and led Terra until UST crashed. After the collapse, he introduced “Revival Plan 2,” which created a split between Terra Classic (LUNC) and Terra 2.0 (the new LUNA).

A. Pros

Founder legitimacy: He understands system architecture and technical debt from day one.

Governance familiarity: Early proposals had his influence, giving LUNC a backbone.

B. Cons

Legal baggage: Facing international legal proceeding.

Trust deficit: His role in the collapse means many see him as a liability, not a savior.

2. CZ: The Industry Titan?

Background
Changpeng Zhao, co-founder and former CEO of Binance, has deep crypto influence. Although he stepped down in Nov 2023 and served four months in prison for money‑laundering, he remains a major strategic advisor globally.

A. Pros

Brand boost: His name adds instant credibility and visibility.

Resource-rich: Binance has burned LUNC tokens and remains engaged in LUNC’s burns

Operational know-how: He’s scaled Binance through tumultuous markets, this experience could leverage LUNC.

B. Cons

Community pushback: Several proposals to appoint him sparked backlash for appearing unserious or overly centralized.

Conflict of interest: As Binance advisor, his strategic goals may not align perfectly with LUNC’s decentralizing ethos.

So who is better :

1. Do Kwon has technical knowledge but legal risks.

2. CZ has resources and trust but no deep link to LUNC’s core.

3. The best option may be a mix CZ as advisor and a trusted team to lead development.

Adit 39
Adit 39https://www.adit39studio.com/
The world shall know PAIN

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

LATEST POSTS

Did You Know: 416.75 Billion LUNC Burned Since May 2022

Since May 13, 2022, the Luna Classic (LUNC) community has relentlessly pushed for token burns to reduce supply and strengthen its ecosystem. Over this period,...

Luna Classic Hosts a Full Suite of Global Stablecoins – Here’s What You Need to Know

The Luna Classic blockchain is home to one of the most diverse stablecoin ecosystems in the crypto space. These stablecoins are pegged to major world...

The Truth About Proof of Stake on Luna Classic That Every Investor Should Know

The Terra Classic blockchain runs on a Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, which determines how transactions are validated and how the network stays secure....

Did you know? The court once ordered Terra Form Labs (TFL) to burn tokens from its own wallets during the Terra Classic crash case

In the Terra Classic crash case, the court issued an order directing Terra Form Labs (TFL) to burn the assets stored in its wallets. In...

https://luncdaily.com/wp-
content/uploads/2025/08/IMG_3245.webp

Most Popular